We work with cruise and hospitality leadership teams to close the gap between what frontier research shows and how commercial decisions actually get made.
Ask the leadership team whether the commercial decisions they made last month built or eroded the asset that will determine their valuation in five years. The room goes quiet.
The commercial decisions that determine enterprise value are made on separate scoreboards with no shared definition of a valuable guest.
Segmentation-based pricing lifts fare revenue over undifferentiated approaches. On a $2B ticket line, that’s $80M annually. Left on the table by pricing that reflects what’s being booked, not who’s booking it.
A meaningful share of promotional spend generates no incremental bookings. Guests learn the cadence and time their purchases. The company discounts demand it would have captured anyway.
Pricing acquires a guest the portfolio model would flag as low-value. That guest gets the same loyalty benefits as a high-value repeat. No one made a bad decision. The system produced a bad outcome.
Being full is not the same as being full with pricing power. The portfolio composition is the difference. These three levers compound when coordinated. In silos, they erode each other.
Until the team shares a portfolio view of guest value, every other commercial decision is built on assumption. Customer equity predicts enterprise value. Occupancy and NPS do not.
Pricing discounts to hit occupancy. The mix shifts toward price-sensitive buyers. Onboard spending drops. Loyalty weakens. Every function met its KPI. The enterprise left real money on the table.
Where you place the peak moment in a guest journey changes how the entire experience is remembered. Two identical sailings can produce different rebooking rates based on sequence alone.
We combine cruise operating experience with frontier academic research. No junior staff. No subcontractors. The people you meet are the people who do the work.
A focused conversation to identify the commercial question that would create the most clarity for your team. Not a sales process. A diagnostic one.
4–8 weeks working alongside your team. Your data meets our research. We build an evidence-based view of what’s working, what’s leaking, and where the highest-impact opportunities are.
Assumptions are auditable. Recommendations are defensible. Your team owns the analysis, and we stay close as the questions evolve and the commercial environment shifts.
No proposal required. Just a focused conversation about where better evidence would create the most clarity for your team.